On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 09:44:58PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 02:50:30PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > Document ethernet PHY package nodes used to describe PHY shipped in
> > bundle of 4-5 PHY. These particular PHY require specific PHY in the
> > package for global onfiguration of the PHY package.
> >
> > Example are PHY package that have some regs only in one PHY of the
> > package and will affect every other PHY in the package, for example
> > related to PHY interface mode calibration or global PHY mode selection.
>
> I think you are being overly narrow here. The 'global' registers could
> be spread over multiple addresses. Particularly for a C22 PHY. I
> suppose they could even be in a N+1 address space, where there is no
> PHY at all.
>
> Where the global registers are is specific to a PHY package
> vendor/model. The PHY driver should know this. All the PHY driver
> needs to know is some sort of base offset. PHY0 in this package is
> using address X. It can then use relative addressing from this base to
> access the global registers for this package.
Yes that would also work but adds extra fragile code in PHY driver.
An idea might be define PHY package node with a reg that is the base
addr... and if we really want every PHY in the PHY package node is an
offset of the base addr.
>
> > It's also possible to specify the property phy-mode to specify that the
> > PHY package sets a global PHY interface mode and every PHY of the
> > package requires to have the same PHY interface mode.
>
> I don't think it is what simple. See the QCA8084 for example. 3 of the
> 4 PHYs must use QXGMII. The fourth PHY can also use QXGMII but it can
> be multiplexed to a different PMA and use 1000BaseX, SGMII or
> 2500BaseX.
Yes that is totally a problem but I think it can only be handled with
some validation in the PHY driver... I assume probe_once would validate
the modes?
>
> I do think we need somewhere to put package properties. But i don't
> think phy-mode is such a property. At the moment, i don't have a good
> example of a package property.
>
And this is the main problem with this thing... Find a good way to
define them that everyone is OK with.
Another idea might be introduce to each PHY a property that point to the
PHY package node (phandle) with all the info... But where to place
that??? Outside mdio node? That would be confusing... This is why I like
this subnode way.
I know it deviates a bit from the normal way of defining small node in
the mdio node one for each PHY.
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + ethernet {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + ethernet-phy-package {
> > + compatible = "ethernet-phy-package";
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
>
> You have the PHYs within the Ethernet node. This is allowed by DT, for
> historic reasons. However, i don't remember the last time a patch was
> submitted that actually used this method. Now a days, PHYs are on an
> MDIO bus, and they are children of that bus in the DT representation.
> However you represent the package needs to work with MDIO busses.
>
Using the ethernet node was an oversight and actually this is defined as
a subnode in the mdio node.
A real DT that use this is (ipq807x):
&mdio {
status = "okay";
pinctrl-0 = <&mdio_pins>;
pinctrl-names = "default";
reset-gpios = <&tlmm 37 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
ethernet-phy-package {
compatible = "ethernet-phy-package";
phy-mode = "psgmii";
global-phys = <&qca8075_4>, <&qca8075_psgmii>;
global-phy-names = "combo", "analog_psgmii";
qca8075_0: ethernet-phy@0 {
compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
reg = <0>;
};
qca8075_1: ethernet-phy@1 {
compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
reg = <1>;
};
qca8075_2: ethernet-phy@2 {
compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
reg = <2>;
};
qca8075_3: ethernet-phy@3 {
compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
reg = <3>;
};
qca8075_4: ethernet-phy@4 {
compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
reg = <4>;
};
qca8075_psgmii: ethernet-phy@5 {
compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c22";
reg = <5>;
};
};
qca8081: ethernet-phy@28 {
compatible = "ethernet-phy-id004d.d101";
reg = <28>;
reset-gpios = <&tlmm 31 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
aqr113c: ethernet-phy@8 {
compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45";
reg = <8>;
reset-gpios = <&tlmm 63 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
};
};
--
Ansuel
