On Wednesday 11 November 2015 10:21:03 Fengguang Wu wrote: > Hi Sinan, > > Sorry please ignore this warning -- it's actually a problem specific > to the mn10300 arch. I'll disable such warning in mn10300 in future. I just tried to find what happened here. mn10300 appears to define the type based on the gcc version: #if __GNUC__ == 4 typedef unsigned int __kernel_size_t; typedef signed int __kernel_ssize_t; #else typedef unsigned long __kernel_size_t; typedef signed long __kernel_ssize_t; #endif while gcc defines it based on whether you are using a Linux targetted gcc or a bare-metal one: gcc/config/mn10300/linux.h:#undef SIZE_TYPE gcc/config/mn10300/mn10300.h:#undef SIZE_TYPE gcc/config/mn10300/mn10300.h:#define SIZE_TYPE "unsigned int" I can think of two reasons why it went wrong here: a) You are using gcc-5.x, and the check in the kernel should be ">=" rather than "==". We should probably fix that regardless b) You are using a bare-metal gcc rather than a Linux version. I couldn't find an mn10300 gcc on kernel.org, which one do you use? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
