On Fri, 17 Nov 2023 at 03:24, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 05:58:30PM +0800, Maria Yu wrote:
> > Registers r7 is removed in clobber list, so compiler may choose r7 for
> > local variables usage, while r7 will be actually updated by the inline asm
> > code. This caused the runtime behavior wrong.
> > While those kind of reserved registers cannot be set to clobber list
> > because of error like "inline asm clobber list contains reserved
> > registers".
> > Explicitly reserve r7 by adding attribute no-omit-frame-pointer for needed
> > function, then in T32 asm code r7 is used as a frame pointer and is not
> > available for use as a general-purpose register.
> > Note that "no-omit-frame-pointer" will make the code size a little bigger
> > to store the stack frame pointer. So limited to needed functions can have
> > the less impact than the full source file.
> >
> > Fixes: dd12e97f3c72 ("ARM: kprobes: treat R7 as the frame pointer register in Thumb2 builds")
> > Signed-off-by: Maria Yu <quic_aiquny@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> This causes warnings with clang:
>
> arch/arm/probes/kprobes/actions-thumb.c:441:47: warning: unknown attribute 'optimize' ignored [-Wunknown-attributes]
> 441 | static unsigned long __kprobes __attribute__((optimize("no-omit-frame-pointer")))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/arm/probes/kprobes/actions-thumb.c:524:38: warning: unknown attribute 'optimize' ignored [-Wunknown-attributes]
> 524 | static void __kprobes __attribute__((optimize("no-omit-frame-pointer")))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/arm/probes/kprobes/actions-thumb.c:560:38: warning: unknown attribute 'optimize' ignored [-Wunknown-attributes]
> 560 | static void __kprobes __attribute__((optimize("no-omit-frame-pointer")))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/arm/probes/kprobes/actions-thumb.c:579:38: warning: unknown attribute 'optimize' ignored [-Wunknown-attributes]
> 579 | static void __kprobes __attribute__((optimize("no-omit-frame-pointer")))
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 4 warnings generated.
>
> Furthermore, as far as I am aware, the optimize attribute has other issues so
> its use is discouraged, see commits 080b6f407635 ("bpf: Don't rely on GCC
> __attribute__((optimize)) to disable GCSE") and a7223f5bfcae ("powerpc: Avoid
> broken GCC __attribute__((optimize))").
>
Ah yes, apalogies for missing that. I did a test build with Clang but
I did not spot the errors. So
Unreviewed-by: ....
Maria, please use the Makefile based per-file CFLAGS override that I
suggested before. There is really no reason to make this per-function.
