On 11/09/2015 02:57 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote: > Current code gives up when 32 bit DMA is not supported. > This problem has been observed on systems without any > memory below 4 gig. > > This patch tests 64 bit support before bailing out to find > a working combination. > That feels decidedly odd. Why do you probe for 64bit if 32bit fails? Typically it's the other way round, on the grounds that 64bit DMA should be preferred over 32bit. Can you explain why it needs to be done the other way round here? Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
