vb2_get_buffer() already checks if the requested index is valid.
Stop duplicating this kind of check everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
index 37f814a89ace..6ba13a95323c 100644
--- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
+++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
@@ -817,10 +817,6 @@ int vb2_qbuf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct media_device *mdev,
return -EBUSY;
}
- if (b->index >= q->num_buffers) {
- dprintk(q, 1, "buffer index out of range\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, b->index);
if (!vb) {
dprintk(q, 1, "can't find the requested buffer %u\n", b->index);
@@ -892,10 +888,6 @@ int vb2_expbuf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct v4l2_exportbuffer *eb)
{
struct vb2_buffer *vb;
- if (eb->index >= q->num_buffers) {
- dprintk(q, 1, "buffer index out of range\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, eb->index);
if (!vb) {
dprintk(q, 1, "can't find the requested buffer %u\n", eb->index);
--
2.39.2
