On 11/7/2023 4:25 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 07/11/2023 10:41, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
On 07/11/2023 08:33, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV wrote:
On 11/4/2023 10:32 PM, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV wrote:
Are you saying to you require/rely on both of these series being
applied first ?
[1]:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/af60c05b-4a0f-51b8-486a-1fc601602515@xxxxxxxxxxx/
[2]:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231016-dwc3-refactor-v1-0-ab4a84165470@xxxxxxxxxxx/
Must be, nothing applies for me in this series.
The first one is not a patch. It is just a discussion thread I
started to get community's opinion before on disconnect interrupt
handling. The current series is based on top of [2] made by Bjorn
(as you already found out) and as I mentioned in cover letter of my
series.
Hi Bryan,
Are you able to apply the series after including Bjorn's patches ?
Also can you confirm if the comments provided to your queries on [1]
are proper and if you have any other comments w.r.t probe deferral.
[1]:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/e700133b-58f7-4a4d-8e5c-0d04441b789b@xxxxxxxxxx/
Regards,
Krishna,
I wonder could you give a base SHA to apply the various series on ?
Your referenced precursor doesn't apply to usb-next
Well now, that doesn't point where I thought it pointed usb-next/master
is extremely old
b3a9e3b9622ae - (HEAD -> usb-next-23-10-07-usb-glue-test, tag:
v5.8-rc1, usb-next/master, origin/tracking-qcomlt-sm8150-gcc,
linaro/tracking-qcomlt-sm8150-gcc, fecked-old, delete-this-branch2,
delete-this-branch) Linux 5.8-rc1 (3 years, 5 months ago)
I want usb-next/main
* d2f51b3516dad - (usb-next/usb-testing, usb-next/usb-next,
usb-next/main) Merge tag 'rtc-6.7' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux (32 hours ago)
Everything applies there.
Hi Bryan,
I should have mentioned that series is pushed on top of usb-next.
Apologies.
Anyway, your pointing to Bjorn's series answers my question re:
sequencing of the probe.
Perfect. Thanks for the confirmation.
Regards,
Krishna,
