On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 03:13:06PM +0530, Krishna chaitanya chundru wrote: > Though we do check the event ring read pointer by "is_valid_ring_ptr" > to make sure it is in the buffer range, but there is another risk the > pointer may be not aligned. Since we are expecting event ring elements > are 128 bits(struct mhi_tre) aligned, an unaligned read pointer could lead "mhi_tre" got renamed to "mhi_ring_element" > to multiple issues like DoS or ring buffer memory corruption. > > So add a alignment check for event ring read pointer. > Since this is a potential fix, you should add the fixes tag and CC stable. > Signed-off-by: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c > index 499590437e9b..c907bbb67fb2 100644 > --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c > +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c > @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static void mhi_del_ring_element(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl, > > static bool is_valid_ring_ptr(struct mhi_ring *ring, dma_addr_t addr) > { > - return addr >= ring->iommu_base && addr < ring->iommu_base + ring->len; > + return addr >= ring->iommu_base && addr < ring->iommu_base + ring->len && addr % 16 == 0; How about, !(addr % 16) - Mani > } > > int mhi_destroy_device(struct device *dev, void *data) > > --- > base-commit: 71e68e182e382e951d6248bccc3c960dcec5a718 > change-id: 20231013-alignment_check-c013f509d24a > > Best regards, > -- > Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@xxxxxxxxxxx> > -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்