On 10/26/23 17:50, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
At the moment we have some complex code for determining if a VFE requires a power-domain attachment. Particularly discordant in this scheme is the subtle reliance on VFE and VFE Lite declaration ordering in our resources. VFE id is used to determine if a VFE is lite or not and consequently if a VFE requires power-domain attachment. VFE Lite though is not a correct delineation between power-domain and non power-domain state since early SoCs have neither VFE Lite nor power-domains attached to VFEs. Introduce has_pd to the VFE resource structure to allow the CAMSS code to understand if it needs to try to attach a power-domain for a given VFE. As a side-effect from this we no longer need to care about VFE Lite or non-Lite or the id number associated with either and which order the VFE/VFE Lite was declared in. Add the flag and populate the resources. Subsequent patches will disjunct on the bool.
Generally such things are expected (?) to ship together, but I see that these patches are quite big as they are, so this is totally fine!
Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> Konrad
