Re: [PATCH V15 2/4] dt-bindings: pwm: add IPQ6018 binding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 10:14:48AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 3:46 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 09:35:48PM +0530, Devi Priya wrote:
> > > +  "#pwm-cells":
> > > +    const: 2
> >
> > The driver only supports normal polarity. Is this a shortcoming of the
> > driver, or is the hardware incapable to do that, too?
> >
> > If it's only the former I'd want #pwm-cells = <3> here. For ease of use
> > I'd not oppose if you pick #pwm-cells = <3> even if the hardware can
> > only do normal polarity.
> 
> Devi, Can we get an answer here soon.
> 
> The MFD part has been applied and it references this schema causing
> warnings. So this needs to land or MFD schema reverted.

Or the reference to the pwm stuff deleted from the mfd binding?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux