Reviving this:
On 12/8/2021 11:22 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Nit: shouldnt the patch prefix be "PATCH i-g-t" ?
We will test this out next week and land this.
---
tools/msm_dp_compliance.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/msm_dp_compliance.c b/tools/msm_dp_compliance.c
index 5e491c89..a15a8dd9 100644
--- a/tools/msm_dp_compliance.c
+++ b/tools/msm_dp_compliance.c
@@ -629,7 +629,9 @@ static const char optstr[] = "hi";
static void __attribute__((noreturn)) usage(char *name, char opt)
{
igt_info("usage: %s [-hi]\n", name);
- igt_info("\t-i\tdump info\n");
+ igt_info("\t-h, --help - print this usage message");
+ igt_info("\t--help-description - print test description");
+ igt_info("\t-i, --info - dump info\n");
igt_info("\tDefault is to respond to Qd980 tests\n");
exit((opt != 'h') ? -1 : 0);
}
@@ -709,6 +711,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
struct option long_opts[] = {
{"help-description", 0, 0, HELP_DESCRIPTION},
{"help", 0, 0, 'h'},
+ {"info", 0, 0, 'i'},
};
enter_exec_path(argv);
