Quoting Konrad Dybcio (2023-09-15 05:19:56)
> On 14.09.2023 08:59, Kathiravan Thirumoorthy wrote:
> > GPLL, NSS crypto PLL clock rates are fixed and shouldn't be scaled based
> > on the request from dependent clocks. Doing so will result in the
> > unexpected behaviour. So drop the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag from the PLL
> > clocks.
> >
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Fixes: b8e7e519625f ("clk: qcom: ipq8074: add remaining PLL’s")
> > Signed-off-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> Stephen, do you think there should be some sort of error
> or at least warning thrown when SET_RATE_PARENT is used with
> RO ops?
>
Sure? How would that be implemented?
