On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 10:26:34AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 11:28 PM Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 05:34:16PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > We have several SCM calls that require passing buffers to the TrustZone > > > on top of the SMC core which allocates memory for calls that require > > > more than 4 arguments. > > > > > > Currently every user does their own thing which leads to code > > > duplication. Many users call dma_alloc_coherent() for every call which > > > is terribly unperformant (speed- and size-wise). > > > > > > Provide a set of library functions for creating and managing pool of > > > memory which is suitable for sharing with the TrustZone, that is: > > > page-aligned, contiguous and non-cachable as well as provides a way of > > > mapping of kernel virtual addresses to physical space. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > [snip] > > > > > I got these warnings with this series: > > > > ahalaney@fedora ~/git/linux-next (git)-[7204cc6c3d73] % ARCH=arm64 CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- make W=1 C=2 drivers/firmware/qcom/ > > drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c:137: warning: Function parameter or member 'size' not described in 'qcom_tzmem_pool_new' > > CHECK drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c > > drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c:204:17: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) > > drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c:204:17: expected void **slot > > drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c:204:17: got void [noderef] __rcu ** > > drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c:204:17: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) > > drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c:204:17: expected void **slot > > drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c:204:17: got void [noderef] __rcu ** > > drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c:204:17: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) > > drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c:204:17: expected void [noderef] __rcu **slot > > drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c:204:17: got void **slot > > drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c:204:17: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) > > drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c:204:17: expected void **slot > > drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c:204:17: got void [noderef] __rcu ** > > drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c:339:13: warning: context imbalance in 'qcom_tzmem_to_phys' - wrong count at exit > > I fixed the other ones but this one I think comes from CHECK not > dealing correctly with the spinlock guard. > > > > > > > All are confusing me, size seems described, I don't know much about > > radix tree usage / rcu, and the locking in qcom_tzmem_to_phys seems sane > > to me but I'm still grappling with the new syntax. > > > > For the one address space one, I _think_ maybe a diff like this is in > > order? > > > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c > > index b3137844fe43..5b409615198d 100644 > > --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c > > +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom/qcom_tzmem.c > > @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ void qcom_tzmem_pool_free(struct qcom_tzmem_pool *pool) > > struct qcom_tzmem_chunk *chunk; > > struct radix_tree_iter iter; > > bool non_empty = false; > > - void **slot; > > + void __rcu **slot; > > > > if (!pool) > > return; > > @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ void qcom_tzmem_pool_free(struct qcom_tzmem_pool *pool) > > > > scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &qcom_tzmem_chunks_lock) { > > radix_tree_for_each_slot(slot, &qcom_tzmem_chunks, &iter, 0) { > > - chunk = *slot; > > + chunk = radix_tree_deref_slot_protected(slot, &qcom_tzmem_chunks_lock); > > We need to keep the lock taken for the duration of the looping so we > can use the regular radix_tree_deref_slot(). IIUC, using the protected version is preferable since you already have the lock in hand: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/RCU/whatisRCU.html#id2 Quote: The variant rcu_dereference_protected() can be used outside of an RCU read-side critical section as long as the usage is protected by locks acquired by the update-side code. This variant avoids the lockdep warning that would happen when using (for example) rcu_dereference() without rcu_read_lock() protection. Using rcu_dereference_protected() also has the advantage of permitting compiler optimizations that rcu_dereference() must prohibit. The rcu_dereference_protected() variant takes a lockdep expression to indicate which locks must be acquired by the caller. If the indicated protection is not provided, a lockdep splat is emitted. Thanks, Andrew > > Bart > > > > > if (chunk->owner == pool) > > non_empty = true; > > > > > > Still planning on reviewing/testing the rest, but got tripped up there > > so thought I'd highlight it before doing the rest. > > > > Thanks, > > Andrew > > >