On 3.10.2023 19:54, Komal Bajaj wrote:
> Add qcm6490 devicetree file for QCM6490 SoC and QCM6490 IDP
> platform. QCM6490 is derived from SC7280 meant for various
> form factor including IoT.
>
> Supported features are, as of now:
> * Debug UART
> * eMMC
> * USB
>
> Signed-off-by: Komal Bajaj <quic_kbajaj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b93270cae9ae
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
> + */
> +
> +#include "sc7280.dtsi"
> +
> +/*
> + * Delete unused sc7280 memory nodes and define the memory regions
> + * required by qcm6490
> + */
> +/delete-node/ &rmtfs_mem;
> +/delete-node/ &wlan_ce_mem;
> +
> +/{
> + reserved-memory {
> + cdsp_secure_heap_mem: cdsp-secure-heap@81800000 {
> + reg = <0x0 0x81800000 0x0 0x1e00000>;
> + no-map;
> + };
> +
> + camera_mem: camera@84300000 {
Uhh.. this is totally not the same memory map that I have on a
random msm-5.4 source+devicetree drop (which does in turn align
with the one on QCM6490 Fairphone 5, as it should because it's
a rebadged reference device for the most part)..
Did you guys *really* redo it between software releases?
This SoC family has been on the market for quite some time,
breaking software expectations like that is not cool, especially
on a product with a promised lifespan of 10 years or whatever!
With that, this really seems more of a change that would belong
in the IDP dts than the 6490-common one..
Konrad
