On 03/10/2023 04:21, Richard Acayan wrote:
The Snapdragon 670 uses similar clocks (with one frequency added) to the
Snapdragon 845 but reports DPU revision 4.1. Add support for this DPU
with configuration from the Pixel 3a downstream kernel.
Since revision 4.0 is SDM845, reuse some configuration from its catalog
entry.
Link: https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm/+/368478b0ae76566927a2769a2bf24dfe7f38bb78/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm670-sde.dtsi
Signed-off-by: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@xxxxxxxxx>
---
.../msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_1_sdm670.h | 104 ++++++++++++++++++
.../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 6 +
.../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c | 1 +
4 files changed, 112 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_1_sdm670.h
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_1_sdm670.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_1_sdm670.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..01a9aec1c956
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_1_sdm670.h
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2015-2018, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (c) 2022. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (c) 2023, Richard Acayan. All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#ifndef _DPU_4_1_SDM670_H
+#define _DPU_4_1_SDM670_H
+
+static const struct dpu_mdp_cfg sdm670_mdp = {
+ .name = "top_0",
+ .base = 0x0, .len = 0x45c,
+ .features = BIT(DPU_MDP_AUDIO_SELECT),
+ .clk_ctrls = {
+ [DPU_CLK_CTRL_VIG0] = { .reg_off = 0x2ac, .bit_off = 0 },
+ [DPU_CLK_CTRL_VIG1] = { .reg_off = 0x2b4, .bit_off = 0 },
+ [DPU_CLK_CTRL_DMA0] = { .reg_off = 0x2ac, .bit_off = 8 },
+ [DPU_CLK_CTRL_DMA1] = { .reg_off = 0x2b4, .bit_off = 8 },
+ [DPU_CLK_CTRL_DMA2] = { .reg_off = 0x2bc, .bit_off = 8 },
+ },
+};
+
+static const struct dpu_sspp_cfg sdm670_sspp[] = {
+ {
+ .name = "sspp_0", .id = SSPP_VIG0,
+ .base = 0x4000, .len = 0x1c8,
+ .features = VIG_SDM845_MASK_SDMA,
+ .sblk = &sdm670_vig_sblk_0,
Could you please rebase you patch on top of
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/119804/
That patchset removes the need for per-SoC, per-SSPP sblk structures.
I'm mostly sure that sdm670 has scaler version 1.3 (the same as sdm845),
but you can verify this by reading the register 0x0ae05a00.
+ .xin_id = 0,
+ .type = SSPP_TYPE_VIG,
+ .clk_ctrl = DPU_CLK_CTRL_VIG0,
+ }, {
+ .name = "sspp_1", .id = SSPP_VIG1,
+ .base = 0x6000, .len = 0x1c8,
+ .features = VIG_SDM845_MASK_SDMA,
+ .sblk = &sdm670_vig_sblk_1,
+ .xin_id = 4,
+ .type = SSPP_TYPE_VIG,
+ .clk_ctrl = DPU_CLK_CTRL_VIG0,
+ }, {
+ .name = "sspp_8", .id = SSPP_DMA0,
+ .base = 0x24000, .len = 0x1c8,
+ .features = DMA_SDM845_MASK_SDMA,
+ .sblk = &sdm845_dma_sblk_0,
+ .xin_id = 1,
+ .type = SSPP_TYPE_DMA,
+ .clk_ctrl = DPU_CLK_CTRL_DMA0,
+ }, {
+ .name = "sspp_9", .id = SSPP_DMA1,
+ .base = 0x26000, .len = 0x1c8,
+ .features = DMA_CURSOR_SDM845_MASK_SDMA,
+ .sblk = &sdm845_dma_sblk_1,
+ .xin_id = 5,
+ .type = SSPP_TYPE_DMA,
+ .clk_ctrl = DPU_CLK_CTRL_DMA1,
+ }, {
+ .name = "sspp_10", .id = SSPP_DMA2,
+ .base = 0x28000, .len = 0x1c8,
+ .features = DMA_CURSOR_SDM845_MASK_SDMA,
+ .sblk = &sdm845_dma_sblk_2,
+ .xin_id = 9,
+ .type = SSPP_TYPE_DMA,
+ .clk_ctrl = DPU_CLK_CTRL_DMA2,
+ },
+};
+
+static const struct dpu_dsc_cfg sdm670_dsc[] = {
+ {
+ .name = "dsc_0", .id = DSC_0,
+ .base = 0x80000, .len = 0x140,
+ }, {
+ .name = "dsc_1", .id = DSC_1,
+ .base = 0x80400, .len = 0x140,
+ },
+};
+
+static const struct dpu_mdss_version sdm670_mdss_ver = {
+ .core_major_ver = 4,
+ .core_minor_ver = 1,
+};
+
+const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_sdm670_cfg = {
+ .mdss_ver = &sdm670_mdss_ver,
+ .caps = &sdm845_dpu_caps,
+ .mdp = &sdm670_mdp,
+ .ctl_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_ctl),
+ .ctl = sdm845_ctl,
+ .sspp_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm670_sspp),
+ .sspp = sdm670_sspp,
+ .mixer_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_lm),
+ .mixer = sdm845_lm,
+ .pingpong_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_pp),
+ .pingpong = sdm845_pp,
+ .dsc_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm670_dsc),
+ .dsc = sdm670_dsc,
+ .intf_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_intf),
+ .intf = sdm845_intf,
+ .vbif_count = ARRAY_SIZE(sdm845_vbif),
We were duplicating the data for different platforms, even if they
looked similar, it was not obvious what is the actual level of
similarity. Nevertheless, for the sdm670 / sdm845 pair I think this
looks good. Especially since we do not expect other DPU 4.x platforms.
+ .vbif = sdm845_vbif,
+ .perf = &sdm845_perf_data,
+};
+
+#endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
index 713dfc079718..63b274ae032a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
@@ -313,6 +313,11 @@ static const struct dpu_rotation_cfg dpu_rot_sc7280_cfg_v2 = {
.rot_format_list = rotation_v2_formats,
};
+static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm670_vig_sblk_0 =
+ _VIG_SBLK(4, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
+static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm670_vig_sblk_1 =
+ _VIG_SBLK(5, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
+
static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_vig_sblk_0 =
_VIG_SBLK(5, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_vig_sblk_1 =
@@ -655,6 +660,7 @@ static const struct dpu_qos_lut_entry sc7180_qos_nrt[] = {
#include "catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h"
#include "catalog/dpu_4_0_sdm845.h"
+#include "catalog/dpu_4_1_sdm670.h"
#include "catalog/dpu_5_0_sm8150.h"
#include "catalog/dpu_5_1_sc8180x.h"
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
index 6c9634209e9f..dae5a1555e44 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
@@ -831,6 +831,7 @@ struct dpu_mdss_cfg {
extern const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_msm8998_cfg;
extern const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_sdm845_cfg;
+extern const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_sdm670_cfg;
extern const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_sm8150_cfg;
extern const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_sc8180x_cfg;
extern const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_sm8250_cfg;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
index aa6ba2cf4b84..0049fb1de1e8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c
@@ -1362,6 +1362,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops dpu_pm_ops = {
static const struct of_device_id dpu_dt_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "qcom,msm8998-dpu", .data = &dpu_msm8998_cfg, },
{ .compatible = "qcom,qcm2290-dpu", .data = &dpu_qcm2290_cfg, },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,sdm670-dpu", .data = &dpu_sdm670_cfg, },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-dpu", .data = &dpu_sdm845_cfg, },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-dpu", .data = &dpu_sc7180_cfg, },
{ .compatible = "qcom,sc7280-dpu", .data = &dpu_sc7280_cfg, },
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
