Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] clk: qcom: camcc-sc8280xp: Add sc8280xp CAMCC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 9/30/23 15:41, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
Add the sc8280xp CAMCC driver which follows the sdm845 CAMCC lineage
with additional CCI and IFE blocks and more granular clock parentage.

Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
[...]

+static struct clk_branch camcc_gdsc_clk = {
+	.halt_reg = 0xc1e4,
+	.halt_check = BRANCH_HALT,
+	.clkr = {
+		.enable_reg = 0xc1e4,
+		.enable_mask = BIT(0),
+		.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
+			.name = "camcc_gdsc_clk",
+			.parent_hws = (const struct clk_hw*[]){
+				&camcc_xo_clk_src.clkr.hw,
+			},
+			.num_parents = 1,
+			.flags = CLK_IS_CRITICAL | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
"meh"

Is this clock only necessary for the GDSC to turn on?

I wanted to say "just chuck it into gdsc.cxcs", but upon actually reading the code, I realized that just doing so doesn't event turn the referenced clocks on.. That's.. a realization.. I think I'll be able to solve a couple bugs with this knowledge..



[...]

+	ret = qcom_cc_really_probe(pdev, &camcc_sc8280xp_desc, regmap);
This conflicts with [1]

+	if (ret)
+		goto err_put_rpm;

[...]

+
+static int __init camcc_sc8280xp_init(void)
+{
+	return platform_driver_register(&camcc_sc8280xp_driver);
+}
+subsys_initcall(camcc_sc8280xp_init);
 module_platform_driver, please

Konrad

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230923112105.18102-4-quic_luoj@xxxxxxxxxxx/



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux