Re: [PATCH 0/9] drm: Annotate structs with __counted_by

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:32:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> This is a batch of patches touching drm for preparing for the coming
> implementation by GCC and Clang of the __counted_by attribute. Flexible
> array members annotated with __counted_by can have their accesses
> bounds-checked at run-time checking via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array
> indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family functions).
> As found with Coccinelle[1], add __counted_by to structs that would
> benefit from the annotation.
> [...]

Since this got Acks, I figure I should carry it in my tree. Let me know
if this should go via drm instead.

Applied to for-next/hardening, thanks!

[1/9] drm/amd/pm: Annotate struct smu10_voltage_dependency_table with __counted_by
[2/9] drm/amdgpu/discovery: Annotate struct ip_hw_instance with __counted_by
[3/9] drm/i915/selftests: Annotate struct perf_series with __counted_by
[4/9] drm/msm/dpu: Annotate struct dpu_hw_intr with __counted_by
[5/9] drm/nouveau/pm: Annotate struct nvkm_perfdom with __counted_by
[6/9] drm/vc4: Annotate struct vc4_perfmon with __counted_by
[7/9] drm/virtio: Annotate struct virtio_gpu_object_array with __counted_by
[8/9] drm/vmwgfx: Annotate struct vmw_surface_dirty with __counted_by
[9/9] drm/v3d: Annotate struct v3d_perfmon with __counted_by

Take care,

Kees Cook

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux