On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 10:01:21PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 26.09.2023 21:06, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 08:49:24PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >> On 26.09.2023 18:51, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> >>> Most MSM8916/MSM8939 devices use very similar setups for the modem,
> >>> because most of the device-specific details are abstracted by the modem
> >>> firmware. There are several definitions (status switches, DAI links
> >>> etc) that will be exactly the same for every board.
> >>>
> >>> Introduce a common msm8916-modem-qdsp6.dtsi include that can be used to
> >>> simplify enabling the modem for such devices. By default the
> >>> digital/analog codec in the SoC/PMIC is used, but boards can define
> >>> additional codecs using the templates for Secondary and Quaternary
> >>> MI2S.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >> I'd rather see at least one usage so that you aren't introducing
> >> effectively non-compiled code..
> >>
> >
> > There are 10 usages in the rest of the patch series.
> > Is that enough? :D
> >
> > IMHO it doesn't make sense to squash this with one of the device
> > patches, especially considering several of them are primarily authored
> > by others.
> I see..
>
> Well, I guess I don't have better counter-arguments, but please
> consider this the next time around.
>
Will do!
> [...]
>
> >>> +&lpass_codec {
> >>> + status = "okay";
> >>> +};
> >> Any reason for it to stay disabled?
> >>
> >
> > You mean in msm8916.dtsi?
> Yes
>
> > For the SoC dtsi we don't make assumptions
> > what devices use or not. There could be devices that ignore the internal
> > codec entirely. If there is nothing connected to the codec lpass_codec
> > should not be enabled (e.g. the msm8916-ufi.dtsi devices).
> See my reply to patch 5
>
> [...]
>
Let's continue discussing that there I guess. :D
> >>> + sound_dai_secondary: mi2s-secondary-dai-link {
> >>> + link-name = "Secondary MI2S";
> >>> + status = "disabled"; /* Needs extra codec configuration */
> >> Hmm.. Potential good user of /omit-if-no-ref/?
> >>
> >
> > AFAICT /omit-if-no-ref/ is for phandle references only. Basically it
> > would only work if you would somewhere reference the phandle:
> >
> > list-of-sound-dais = <&sound_dai_primary &sound_dai_secondary>;
> >
> > But this doesn't exist so /omit-if-no-ref/ cannot be used here.
> Ahh right, this is the one we don't reference.. Too bad,
> would be a nice fit :/
>
> I only see one usage of it though (patch 7), perhaps it could
> be kept local to that one?
>
This patch series just contains the initial set of
msm8916-modem-qdsp6.dtsi users (for devices which are already upstream).
We probably have like 20 more that still need to be upstreamed. :D
sound_dai_secondary is fairly rare, but there is at least one more user
that will probably end up upstream soon.
I think the overhead of these template notes is absolutely negligible
compared to all the (potentially) unused SoC nodes we have. :D
Thanks,
Stephan
