Re: [PATCH V1 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add UFS host controller and phy nodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/22/2023 12:38 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 03:19:37PM +0530, Nitin Rawat wrote:
Add UFS host controller and PHY nodes for sc7280.


You should split this patch into 2. One for SoC and another for board.
Updated in Latest Patchset.


Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi | 19 +++++++
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi     | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 83 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
index 2ff549f4dc7a..c60cdd511222 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
@@ -451,6 +451,25 @@
  	status = "okay";
  };

+&ufs_mem_hc {
+	reset-gpios = <&tlmm 175 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+	vcc-supply = <&vreg_l7b_2p9>;
+	vcc-max-microamp = <800000>;
+	vccq-supply = <&vreg_l9b_1p2>;
+	vccq-max-microamp = <900000>;
+	vccq2-supply = <&vreg_l9b_1p2>;
+	vccq2-max-microamp = <900000>;
+
+	status = "okay";
+};
+
+&ufs_mem_phy {
+	vdda-phy-supply = <&vreg_l10c_0p8>;
+	vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l6b_1p2>;
+
+	status = "okay";
+};
+
  &sdhc_1 {
  	status = "okay";

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
index 925428a5f6ae..d4a15d56b384 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
@@ -908,6 +908,70 @@
  			};
  		};

+		ufs_mem_phy: phy@1d87000 {

Please sort the nodes in ascending order.
Updated in Latest Patchset.


+			compatible = "qcom,sc7280-qmp-ufs-phy";
+			reg = <0x0 0x01d87000 0x0 0xe00>;
+			clocks = <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_1_CLKREF_EN>;
+			clock-names = "ref", "ref_aux", "qref";
+
+			resets = <&ufs_mem_hc 0>;
+			reset-names = "ufsphy";
+
+			#clock-cells = <1>;
+			#phy-cells = <0>;
+
+			status = "disabled";
+
+		};
+
+		ufs_mem_hc: ufs@1d84000 {
+			compatible = "qcom,sc7280-ufshc", "qcom,ufshc",
+				     "jedec,ufs-2.0";
+			reg = <0x0 0x01d84000 0x0 0x3000>;
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 265 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			phys = <&ufs_mem_phy>;
+			phy-names = "ufsphy";
+			lanes-per-direction = <2>;
+			#reset-cells = <1>;
+			resets = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_BCR>;
+			reset-names = "rst";
+
+			power-domains = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
+			required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
+
+			iommus = <&apps_smmu 0x80 0x0>;
+			dma-coherent;
+
+			clock-names = "core_clk",
+				      "bus_aggr_clk",
+				      "iface_clk",
+				      "core_clk_unipro",
+				      "ref_clk",
+				      "tx_lane0_sync_clk",
+				      "rx_lane0_sync_clk",
+				      "rx_lane1_sync_clk";

"clocks" property should come first.
 DT binding shows clock-names first followed by clocks.
 Let me know if see still see concern, would update .


- Mani

+			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_AGGRE_UFS_PHY_AXI_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_AHB_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_UNIPRO_CORE_CLK>,
+				 <&rpmhcc RPMH_CXO_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_TX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_0_CLK>,
+				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_RX_SYMBOL_1_CLK>;
+			freq-table-hz =
+				<75000000 300000000>,
+				<0 0>,
+				<0 0>,
+				<75000000 300000000>,
+				<0 0>,
+				<0 0>,
+				<0 0>,
+				<0 0>;
+			status = "disabled";
+		};
+
  		sdhc_1: mmc@7c4000 {
  			compatible = "qcom,sc7280-sdhci", "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5";
  			pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
--
2.17.1



Thanks,
Nitin



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux