Re: [Freedreno] [PATCH RFC v6 07/10] drm/atomic: Loosen FB atomic checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 8/29/2023 1:22 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 17:05:13 -0700
Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Loosen the requirements for atomic and legacy commit so that, in cases
where pixel_source != FB, the commit can still go through.

This includes adding framebuffer NULL checks in other areas to account for
FB being NULL when non-FB pixel sources are enabled.

To disable a plane, the pixel_source must be NONE or the FB must be NULL
if pixel_source == FB.

Signed-off-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c        | 20 +++++++++++---------
  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
  include/drm/drm_atomic_helper.h     |  4 ++--
  include/drm/drm_plane.h             | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  4 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

...

diff --git a/include/drm/drm_plane.h b/include/drm/drm_plane.h
index a58f84b6bd5e..4c5b7bcdb25c 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_plane.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_plane.h
@@ -992,6 +992,35 @@ static inline struct drm_plane *drm_plane_find(struct drm_device *dev,
  #define drm_for_each_plane(plane, dev) \
  	list_for_each_entry(plane, &(dev)->mode_config.plane_list, head)
+/**
+ * drm_plane_solid_fill_enabled - Check if solid fill is enabled on plane
+ * @state: plane state
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * Whether the plane has been assigned a solid_fill_blob
+ */
+static inline bool drm_plane_solid_fill_enabled(struct drm_plane_state *state)
+{
+	if (!state)
+		return false;
+	return state->pixel_source == DRM_PLANE_PIXEL_SOURCE_SOLID_FILL && state->solid_fill_blob;
+}
+
+static inline bool drm_plane_has_visible_data(const struct drm_plane_state *state)
+{
+	switch (state->pixel_source) {
+	case DRM_PLANE_PIXEL_SOURCE_NONE:
+		return false;
+	case DRM_PLANE_PIXEL_SOURCE_SOLID_FILL:
+		return state->solid_fill_blob != NULL;

This reminds me, new UAPI docs did not say what the requirements are for
choosing solid fill pixel source. Is the atomic commit rejected if
pixel source is solid fill, but solid_fill property has no blob?

Hi Pekka,

Yes, if pixel_source is solid_fill and the solid_fill property blob isn't set, the atomic commit should throw an error.

Will document this in the UAPI.

Thanks,

Jessica Zhang


This should be doc'd.


Thanks,
pq

+	case DRM_PLANE_PIXEL_SOURCE_FB:
+	default:
+		WARN_ON(state->pixel_source != DRM_PLANE_PIXEL_SOURCE_FB);
+	}
+
+	return state->fb != NULL;
+}
+
  bool drm_any_plane_has_format(struct drm_device *dev,
  			      u32 format, u64 modifier);




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux