On 19/09/2023 09:28, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:
>
>
> On 9/15/2023 6:16 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 15/09/2023 14:15, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:
>>> IPQ5018 has tsens V1.0 IP with 4 sensors.
>>> There is no RPM, so tsens has to be manually enabled. Adding the tsens
>>> and nvmem node and IPQ5018 has 4 thermal sensors (zones). With the
>>> critical temperature being 120'C and action is to reboot. Adding all
>>> the 4 zones here.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> [v2] Fixed node names, order and added qfprom cells for points
>>> seperately to use the calibrate_common and squashed thermal_zone
>>> nodes here
>>>
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi | 169 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 169 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi
>>> index 9f13d2dcdfd5..d53aea5342e2 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi
>>> @@ -93,6 +93,117 @@ soc: soc@0 {
>>> #size-cells = <1>;
>>> ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>;
>>>
>>> + qfprom: qfprom@a0000 {
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <1>;
>>> + compatible = "qcom,ipq5018-qfprom", "qcom,qfprom";
>>
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>
>> It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
>> feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
>> Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
>> requested changes or keep discussing them.
>>
>
> oops, moved the compatible to first, but missed it on posting version.
> Will fix it in V3.
What do you mean by "posting version"? If it is not the same as your Git
version, then your process is buggy. You must work on mainline tree and
send patches from that tree. Not edit patches and edit Git separately...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
