On 9/15/2023 5:29 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Sat, 16 Sept 2023 at 00:38, Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Currently the dp_display_irq_handler() is executed at msm_dp_modeset_init()
which ties irq registration to the DPU device's life cycle, while depending on
resources that are released as the DP device is torn down. Move register DP
driver irq handler at dp_display_probe() to have dp_display_irq_handler()
is tied with DP device.
Changes in v3:
-- move calling dp_display_irq_handler() to probe
Was there a changelog for the previous reivions? What is the
difference between v1 and v2?
Sorry, v2 is same as v3.
I submitted v2 first but found i forget to add change logs from review
comments of v1.
Therefore i submit v3 to add changes logs which missing at v2.
Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 35 +++++++++++++----------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
index 76f1395..c217430 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
@@ -1193,30 +1193,23 @@ static irqreturn_t dp_display_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
return ret;
}
-int dp_display_request_irq(struct msm_dp *dp_display)
+static int dp_display_request_irq(struct dp_display_private *dp)
{
int rc = 0;
- struct dp_display_private *dp;
-
- if (!dp_display) {
- DRM_ERROR("invalid input\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- dp = container_of(dp_display, struct dp_display_private, dp_display);
+ struct device *dev = &dp->pdev->dev;
- dp->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(dp->pdev->dev.of_node, 0);
if (!dp->irq) {
What is the point in this check?
- DRM_ERROR("failed to get irq\n");
- return -EINVAL;
+ dp->irq = platform_get_irq(dp->pdev, 0);
+ if (!dp->irq) {
+ DRM_ERROR("failed to get irq\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
}
- rc = devm_request_irq(dp_display->drm_dev->dev, dp->irq,
- dp_display_irq_handler,
+ rc = devm_request_irq(dev, dp->irq, dp_display_irq_handler,
IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH, "dp_display_isr", dp);
if (rc < 0) {
- DRM_ERROR("failed to request IRQ%u: %d\n",
- dp->irq, rc);
+ DRM_ERROR("failed to request IRQ%u: %d\n", dp->irq, rc);
return rc;
}
@@ -1287,6 +1280,10 @@ static int dp_display_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, &dp->dp_display);
+ rc = dp_display_request_irq(dp);
+ if (rc)
+ return rc;
This way the IRQ ends up being enabled in _probe. Are we ready to
handle it here? Is the DP device fully setup at this moment?
+
rc = component_add(&pdev->dev, &dp_display_comp_ops);
if (rc) {
DRM_ERROR("component add failed, rc=%d\n", rc);
@@ -1549,12 +1546,6 @@ int msm_dp_modeset_init(struct msm_dp *dp_display, struct drm_device *dev,
dp_priv = container_of(dp_display, struct dp_display_private, dp_display);
- ret = dp_display_request_irq(dp_display);
- if (ret) {
- DRM_ERROR("request_irq failed, ret=%d\n", ret);
- return ret;
- }
-
ret = dp_display_get_next_bridge(dp_display);
if (ret)
return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
index 1e9415a..b3c08de 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.h
@@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ struct msm_dp {
int dp_display_set_plugged_cb(struct msm_dp *dp_display,
hdmi_codec_plugged_cb fn, struct device *codec_dev);
int dp_display_get_modes(struct msm_dp *dp_display);
-int dp_display_request_irq(struct msm_dp *dp_display);
bool dp_display_check_video_test(struct msm_dp *dp_display);
int dp_display_get_test_bpp(struct msm_dp *dp_display);
void dp_display_signal_audio_start(struct msm_dp *dp_display);
--
2.7.4
