On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 21:55, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It's certainly possible that for large resolutions a single DPU SSPP > cannot process the image without exceeding the MDP clock limits but > it can still process it in multirect mode because the source rectangles > will get divided and can fall within the MDP clock limits. > > If the SSPP cannot process the image even in multirect mode, then it > will be rejected in dpu_plane_atomic_check_pipe(). > > Hence try using multirect for resolutions which cannot be processed > by a single SSPP without exceeding the MDP clock limits. > > Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c > index 62dd9f9b4dce..85072328cd53 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c > @@ -792,6 +792,7 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane, > plane); > int ret = 0, min_scale; > struct dpu_plane *pdpu = to_dpu_plane(plane); > + struct dpu_kms *kms = _dpu_plane_get_kms(&pdpu->base); > struct dpu_plane_state *pstate = to_dpu_plane_state(new_plane_state); > struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe = &pstate->pipe; > struct dpu_sw_pipe *r_pipe = &pstate->r_pipe; > @@ -860,7 +861,8 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane, > > max_linewidth = pdpu->catalog->caps->max_linewidth; > > - if (drm_rect_width(&pipe_cfg->src_rect) > max_linewidth) { > + if ((drm_rect_width(&pipe_cfg->src_rect) > max_linewidth) || > + _dpu_plane_calc_clk(&crtc_state->mode, pipe_cfg) > kms->perf.max_core_clk_rate) { First, I think this should be an adjusted_mode too. And this probably needs some more attention in the next few lines of code, since .e.g the UBWC case also needs to be adjusted. > /* > * In parallel multirect case only the half of the usual width > * is supported for tiled formats. If we are here, we know that > -- > 2.40.1 > -- With best wishes Dmitry