Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/msm/dpu: fail dpu_plane_atomic_check() based on mdp clk limits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 21:56, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Currently, dpu_plane_atomic_check() does not check whether the
> plane can process the image without exceeding the per chipset
> limits for MDP clock. This leads to underflow issues because the
> SSPP is not able to complete the processing for the data rate of
> the display.
>
> Fail the dpu_plane_atomic_check() if the SSPP cannot process the
> image without exceeding the MDP clock limits.
>
> Fixes: 25fdd5933e4c ("drm/msm: Add SDM845 DPU support")
> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> index 98c1b22e9bca..62dd9f9b4dce 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_plane.c
> @@ -733,9 +733,11 @@ static int dpu_plane_check_inline_rotation(struct dpu_plane *pdpu,
>  static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_pipe(struct dpu_plane *pdpu,
>                 struct dpu_sw_pipe *pipe,
>                 struct dpu_sw_pipe_cfg *pipe_cfg,
> -               const struct dpu_format *fmt)
> +               const struct dpu_format *fmt,
> +               const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
>  {
>         uint32_t min_src_size;
> +       struct dpu_kms *kms = _dpu_plane_get_kms(&pdpu->base);
>
>         min_src_size = DPU_FORMAT_IS_YUV(fmt) ? 2 : 1;
>
> @@ -774,6 +776,12 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check_pipe(struct dpu_plane *pdpu,
>                 return -EINVAL;
>         }
>
> +       /* max clk check */
> +       if (_dpu_plane_calc_clk(mode, pipe_cfg) > kms->perf.max_core_clk_rate) {
> +               DPU_DEBUG_PLANE(pdpu, "plane exceeds max mdp core clk limits\n");
> +               return -E2BIG;
> +       }
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -899,12 +907,13 @@ static int dpu_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
>                 r_pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x1 = pipe_cfg->dst_rect.x2;
>         }
>
> -       ret = dpu_plane_atomic_check_pipe(pdpu, pipe, pipe_cfg, fmt);
> +       ret = dpu_plane_atomic_check_pipe(pdpu, pipe, pipe_cfg, fmt, &crtc_state->mode);
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
>
>         if (r_pipe->sspp) {
> -               ret = dpu_plane_atomic_check_pipe(pdpu, r_pipe, r_pipe_cfg, fmt);
> +               ret = dpu_plane_atomic_check_pipe(pdpu, r_pipe, r_pipe_cfg, fmt,
> +                                                 &crtc_state->mode);

I think this should be adjusted_mode. In the end, according to the
docs CRTC should be programmed with the adjusted_mode, while the
state->mode is the mode at the end of the pipeline (if I got it
correct).

So e.g. if we add DS to the picture, state->mode will be screen
resolution, while adjusted_moe will be pre-scale resolution, which is
the one that matters from the bandwidth point of view.


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux