[]..
+static inline int code_to_degc(u32 adc_code, const struct tsens_sensor *s) +{ + int degc, num, den; + + num = (adc_code * SLOPE_FACTOR) - s->offset; + den = s->slope; + + if (num > 0) + degc = num + (den / 2); + else if (num < 0) + degc = num - (den / 2); + else + degc = num; + + degc /= den; + + return degc; +} + +int get_temp_common(struct tsens_device *tmdev, int id, int *temp) +{ + struct tsens_sensor *s = &tmdev->sensor[id]; + u32 code; + unsigned int sensor_addr; + int last_temp = 0, ret; + + sensor_addr = S0_ST_ADDR + s->hw_id * SN_ADDR_OFFSET; + ret = regmap_read(tmdev->map, sensor_addr, &code); + if (ret) + return ret; + last_temp = code & SN_ST_TEMP_MASK; + + *temp = code_to_degc(last_temp, s) * 1000; + + return 0; +}The way this function is coded the temperature will only ever change by 1C (i.e., 1000mC). Is there a chance that you're losing precision in the code_to_degc conversion that could be preserved perhaps? This is useful in scenarios where you use the power allocator governor and the greater precision allows better power budget estimation.
I'll take a look to see if we can get better precision. Thanks. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
