On 28/08/2023 19:51, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
+ break;
+ default:
return -EINVAL;
This should never happen, as adding support for a new SoC should come
with an update for all the applicable switch/case statements. It's
useful to let the compiler complain if someone forgets to do so, but
with a default case, you will only see the issue at runtime. Could it be
caught at compile time ?
Off the top of my head, I don't think it could be easily caught.
An assert() would catch it early in runtime..
---
bod
