Hi Bryan,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 09:06:23PM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> check_clock doesn't account for vfe_lite which means that vfe_lite will
> never get validated by this routine. Add the clock name to the expected set
> to remediate.
>
> Fixes: 7319cdf189bb ("media: camss: Add support for VFE hardware version Titan 170")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
> index 938f373bcd1fd..b021f81cef123 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c
> @@ -535,7 +535,8 @@ static int vfe_check_clock_rates(struct vfe_device *vfe)
> struct camss_clock *clock = &vfe->clock[i];
>
> if (!strcmp(clock->name, "vfe0") ||
> - !strcmp(clock->name, "vfe1")) {
> + !strcmp(clock->name, "vfe1") ||
> + !strcmp(clock->name, "vfe_lite")) {
> u64 min_rate = 0;
> unsigned long rate;
>
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
