On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 05:23:58PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 28/08/2023 17:14, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > On 8/28/23 15:48, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> Hi Bjorn, > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 3:37 PM Bjorn Andersson > >> <quic_bjorande@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 11:14:41AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > >>>> On Sat, 26 Aug 2023, Guru Das Srinagesh <quic_gurus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> This script runs get_maintainer.py on a given patch file (or multiple > >>>>> patch files) and adds its output to the patch file in place with the > >>>>> appropriate email headers "To: " or "Cc: " as the case may be. These new > >>>>> headers are added after the "From: " line in the patch. > >>>> > >>>> FWIW, I personally prefer tooling to operate on git branches and commits > >>>> than patches. For me, the patches are just an intermediate step in > >>>> getting the commits from my git branch to the mailing list. That's not > >>>> where I add the Cc's, but rather in the commits in my local branch, > >>>> where they're preserved. YMMV. > >>>> > >>> > >>> May I ask how you add/carry the recipients in a commit? > >> > >> I guess below a "---" line in the commit description? > > > > Does that do anything special in commit log? I'd expect (and I do it that > > way) it's rather just adding a > > It does. It goes away. Afaict, it's verbatim copied into the .patch, which would mean that it goes away when the patch is applied on the other side. But it's still going to be in the email (followed by another ---), so unless there's another step later in the process that cleans this up I it looks ugly, and not very useful - unless I'm missing something. > > > > Cc: Name <email> > > > > in the tag area where s-o-b, reviewed-by etc are added. > > Why storing autogenerated scripts/get_maintainer.pl CC-entries in commit > msg? The non-maintainer-output but the automated output? There is no > single need to store automated output of get_maintainers.pl in the git > log. It can be easily re-created at any given time, thus its presence in > the git history is redundant and obfuscates the log. > Fully agree to this. In particular if the patch is going to be sent as part of a series the recipients list won't be accurate for any patch. The case I was looking for was the case where I want to make sure to include a specific person, beyond the get_maintainers output. So pretty much the usual Cc: tag in the commit message, but I don't necessarily want to write this fact into the git history. Regards, Bjorn
