Hi,
On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 3:28 PM David Heidelberg <david@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Cheza firmware doesn't allow controlling LMh from the operating system.
>
> Fixes: 36c6581214c4 ("arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Add support for LMh node")
> Suggested-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi
> index d86b0d112110..8cc8fc290fd3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi
> @@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ panel_in_edp: endpoint {
> };
> };
>
> +&cpufreq_hw {
> + /delete-property/ interrupts-extended; /* reference to lmh_cluster[01] */
> +};
> +
> &psci {
> /delete-node/ power-domain-cpu0;
> /delete-node/ power-domain-cpu1;
> @@ -275,6 +279,14 @@ &BIG_CPU_SLEEP_1
> &CLUSTER_SLEEP_0>;
> };
>
> +&lmh_cluster0 {
> + status = "disabled";
> +};
> +
> +&lmh_cluster1 {
> + status = "disabled";
> +};
It's not a huge deal to me, but as I understand it usually you'd put
the "disabled" in sdm845.dtsi and then it would be up to all the other
sdm845 boards to mark this as "okay".
> /*
> * Reserved memory changes
> *
> @@ -338,6 +350,8 @@ flash@0 {
>
>
> &apps_rsc {
> + /delete-property/ power-domains;
> +
Is the deletion of the "power-domains" here related to LMh? That seems
like it was added to sdm845.dtsi in a separate commit that doesn't
talk about LMh at all...
-Doug
