On 22/08/2023 13:55, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 at 13:31, Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:* Fix indentation * Drop simple success messages Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- v9: Fix line break alignment Remove register success print v8 version of the driver has been picked up for merge. (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/169226613917.81413.1200008047604336868.b4-ty@xxxxxxxxxx/) v8: Change commit subject and message per review comments Don't include of_platform.h Change struct init coding style GENMASK -> BIT for one define v6: Kconfig:Add COMPILE_TEST and remove USB_GADGET from 'depends' Change 'selects' USB_PHY -> GENERIC_PHY Driver: Use correct headers const int -> unsigned int for 'nregs' in private data Use generic names for clk, phy in m31 phy structure Init register details directly instead of using macro Use dev_err_probe in the error paths of driver probe v5: Kconfig and Makefile:- place snippet according to sorted order Use generic phy instead of usb-phy Use ARRAY_SIZE for reg init instead of blank last entry Fix copyright year v4: Remove unused enum Error handling for devm_clk_get v1: Combine driver, makefile and kconfig into 1 patch Remove 'qscratch' region and its usage. The controller driver takes care of those settings Use compatible/data to handle ipq5332 init Drop the default case Get resources by index instead of name as there is only one resource Add clock Fix review comments in the driver --- drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-m31.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-m31.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-m31.c index ed08072..ea79c18 100644 --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-m31.c +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-m31.c @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static int m31usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) qphy->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL); if (IS_ERR(qphy->clk)) return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(qphy->clk), - "failed to get clk\n"); + "failed to get clk\n");But why are you trying to fix this? aligning next line to the opening bracket is perfectly fine (and is one of the endorsed styles).
Ugh, excuse me. My mailer displayed alignment in a wrong way. This LGTM except the last chunk (removal of the info message).
data = of_device_get_match_data(dev); qphy->regs = data->regs; @@ -252,18 +252,16 @@ static int m31usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) qphy->phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, &m31usb_phy_gen_ops); if (IS_ERR(qphy->phy)) return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(qphy->phy), - "failed to create phy\n"); + "failed to create phy\n"); qphy->vreg = devm_regulator_get(dev, "vdda-phy"); if (IS_ERR(qphy->vreg)) return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(qphy->phy), - "failed to get vreg\n"); + "failed to get vreg\n"); phy_set_drvdata(qphy->phy, qphy); phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate); - if (!IS_ERR(phy_provider)) - dev_info(dev, "Registered M31 USB phy\n");This is irrelevant to the indentation.return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(phy_provider); } -- 2.7.4
-- With best wishes Dmitry
