Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> 于2023年8月6日周日 04:11写道：
>On 05/08/2023 19:03, Xilin Wu via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Xilin Wu <wuxilin123@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Add support for Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra. This commit brings support for:
>> * Front and rear display panels (initialized by bootloader)
>> * USB
>> * UFS
>> * PCIe0
>> * Thermistor sensors
>> * ADSP/CDSP/Modem/SLPI
>> * IR Transmitter
>> * RTC provided by PMK8350
>> * Buttons
>>
>
>...
>
>
>> +/*
>> + * Delete following upstream (sm8350.dtsi) reserved
>> + * memory mappings which are different on this device.
>
>
>> + */
>> +/delete-node/ &pil_adsp_mem;
>> +/delete-node/ &pil_slpi_mem;
>> +/delete-node/ &pil_cdsp_mem;
>> +/delete-node/ &pil_ipa_fw_mem;
>> +/delete-node/ &pil_ipa_gsi_mem;
>> +/delete-node/ &pil_gpu_mem;
>> +/delete-node/ &pil_spss_mem;
>> +/delete-node/ &pil_modem_mem;
>> +/delete-node/ &rmtfs_mem;
>> +/delete-node/ &pil_trustedvm_mem;
>> +/delete-node/ &removed_mem;
>> +
>> +/ {
>> + model = "Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra";
>> + compatible = "xiaomi,star", "qcom,sm8350";
>> + chassis-type = "handset";
>> +
>> + chosen {
>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> + ranges;
>> +
>> + framebuffer0: framebuffer-front@ea600000 {
>
>framebuffer@
>
>> + compatible = "simple-framebuffer";
>> + reg = <0 0xea600000 0 (1440 * 3200 * 4)>;
>> +
>> + width = <1440>;
>> + height = <3200>;
>> + stride = <(1440 * 4)>;
>> + format = "a8r8g8b8";
>> + };
>> +
>> + framebuffer1: framebuffer-rear@eb79c000 {
>
>framebuffer@
>
>> + compatible = "simple-framebuffer";
>> + reg = <0 0xeb79c000 0 (126 * 294 * 4)>;
>> +
>> + width = <126>;
>> + height = <294>;
>> + stride = <(126 * 4)>;
>> + format = "a8r8g8b8";
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>
Will fix in v2.
>
>
>> + reg = <0 0x86100000 0 0x3900000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> +
>> + pil_slpi_mem: memory@89a00000 {
>> + reg = <0 0x89a00000 0 0x2f00000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> +
>> + pil_cdsp_mem: memory@8c900000 {
>> + reg = <0 0x8c900000 0 0x1e00000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> +
>> + pil_ipa_fw_mem: memory@8e700000 {
>> + reg = <0 0x8e700000 0 0x10000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> +
>> + pil_ipa_gsi_mem: memory@8e710000 {
>> + reg = <0 0x8e710000 0 0xa000>;
>> + no-map;
>> + };
>> +
>
>...
>
>> +&pm8350c_gpios {
>> + gpio-line-names = "VDD_BOOST_5V_EN",
>> + "NC",
>> + "OTG_OVP_EN",
>> + "WL_TXON",
>> + "NC",
>> + "NC",
>> + "NC",
>> + "NC",
>> + "NC";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&pmk8350_adc_tm {
>> + status = "okay";
>> +
>> + pm8350-skin-therm@0 {
>
>Hm, didn't we change the node names to generic "channel" and started
>using labels? At least in next or ongoing patches? Or was it only for VADC?
I thought it was only for VADC. "channel" is not used in binding as well.
