Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8996: Improve GPU OPP table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26.05.2023 15:30, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 30.03.2023 12:57, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 29.03.2023 23:32, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 22:17, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Remove the self-explanatory comment about opp-supported-hw contents,
>>>> add required-opps to ensure reasonable power domain levels are voted
>>>> for (currently we've been piggybacking off of miracles and MDP votes)
>>>> and add newlines between each subnode.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure this is 100% correct. The values that you add are correct
>>> for the voltage scaling case. However, based on the vendor kernel
>>> sources I think that MX should only be scaled if the voltage is scaled
>>> too. I might be wrong here.
>> MX must be >= CX (and GX), so this should bring no harm.
>>
>> (citation needed, but that seems to hold true..)
> With that in mind, would you ack these patches Dmitry?
Bump?

Konrad



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux