Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] mailbox/arm64/ qcom: rework compatibles for fallback

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/08/2023 14:21, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 22.03.2023 18:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Changes since v2
>> ================
>> 1. Split fixes to separate patchset which is now dependency:
>>    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230322173559.809805-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#t
>> 2. Add Ack
>> 3. No other changes, as discussion with Dmitry did not reach conclusion on incompatibility.
>>
>> Changes since v1
>> ================
>> 1. Rebase
>> 2. Make msm8994 fallback for several variants, not msm8953, because the latter
>>    actually might take some clocks.
>> 3. Two new patches for SDX55.
>> 4. Minor corrections in bindings style.
>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230202161856.385825-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx/
>>
>> Description
>> ===========
>>
>> If entire approach is accepted (and correct), there are no dependencies and
>> patches can be picked independently.  Although the best in the same cycle, so
>> there will be no new `dtbs_check` warnings.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
> Looks like this was only partially merged, resulting in schema warnings

There was discussion/disagreement about the bindings. DTS was applied,
thus it's partially limbo state...

Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux