On 4.08.2023 23:12, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 04/08/2023 22:10, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>> Would it not be more legitimate and logical to have 8350 use 8280xp's frequency table, instead of 8250 ? >> top freq is higher on 8280 > > Still though its a bit suspicious 8350 doesn't have its own table. > > Are we missing the downstream reference ? 8250: qcom,allowed-clock-rates = <239999999 338000000 366000000 444000000>; 8350: qcom,allowed-clock-rates = <239999999 338000000 366000000 444000000>; (identical) Konrad
