On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 03:47:26PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 07:35:18AM -0700, Trilok Soni wrote: > > On 8/3/2023 12:06 AM, Souradeep Chowdhury wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 6/28/2023 3:53 PM, Souradeep Chowdhury wrote: > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > https://git.codelinaro.org/clo/le/platform/vendor/qcom-opensource/tools/-/tree/opensource-tools.lnx.1.0.r176-rel/dcc_parser > > > > > > > > Changes in v25 > > > > > > > > * Updated the documentation of the structure dcc_config_entry as per > > > > the comments in V23 > > > > * Updated the documentation of the dcc Kconfig definition as per > > > > comment in V24 > > > > * Used u64 where applicable > > > > * Removed the mutex locks where it is not needed > > > > * Removed the use of unlikely keyword > > > > * Renamed "nr_link_list" to "max_link_list" > > > > > > > > Souradeep Chowdhury (3): > > > > dt-bindings: misc: qcom,dcc: Add the dtschema > > > > misc: dcc: Add driver support for Data Capture and Compare unit(DCC) > > > > MAINTAINERS: Add the entry for DCC(Data Capture and Compare) driver > > > > support > > > > > > > > Documentation/ABI/testing/debugfs-driver-dcc | 10 +- > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/misc/qcom,dcc.yaml | 44 + > > > > MAINTAINERS | 8 + > > > > drivers/misc/Kconfig | 8 + > > > > drivers/misc/Makefile | 1 + > > > > drivers/misc/qcom-dcc.c | 1312 +++++++++++++++++ > > > > 6 files changed, 1378 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/qcom,dcc.yaml > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/misc/qcom-dcc.c > > > > > > Gentle Ping > > > > Thank you for the reminder Souradeep. Greg and others, please see if we need > > any changes here or it can be picked up? > > It would help if the code would actually build: > > drivers/misc/qcom-dcc.c: In function ‘ready_read’: > drivers/misc/qcom-dcc.c:853:13: error: unused variable ‘ret’ [-Werror=unused-variable] > 853 | int ret = 0; > | ^~~ > > {sigh} > > How in the world was this ever tested? Ok, next time I want to see some QCOM engineers to sign off on this that it was actually tested and they can back it up that this is ready to be merged. When the code doesn't even build, that is a huge red flag that this whole thing is being rushed as it obviously was never tested in the form that was submitted for inclusion. You all know better than this. greg k-h
