On 8/2/23 19:49, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
Hi Marek
On 8/2/2023 10:25 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 8/2/23 15:08, neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Marek,
On 02/08/2023 14:25, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 8/2/23 10:39, neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Marek,
Hi,
On 13/07/2023 20:28, Marek Vasut wrote:
<snip>
MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_NO_HFP means the HBP period is just skipped
by DSIM.
Maybe there is a need for new set of flags which differentiate
between HBP skipped (i.e. NO HBP) and HBP LP11 ?
No, the section of the MIPI DSI spec I posted below clearly
states there are two options:
1) send blanking packets during those periods
2) transition to LP11 during those periods
There is no 3rd option in the spec of not doing both like what
you are suggesting. So DSIM should also be only transitioning to
LP11 during those periods if its not sending the blanking packets
with those flags set.
So, there is no need for any new set of flags to differentiate.
The flags and their interpretation is correct in MSM driver. I
cannot comment on what exactly DSIM does with those flags.
How do you explain the comment in include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h:
128 /* disable hback-porch area */
129 #define MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_NO_HBP BIT(6)
Can you specify how you determined those flags were needed on DSIM
? a vendor tree ? a datasheet ?
The following upstream commit:
996e1defca344 ("drm: exynos: dsi: Fix MIPI_DSI*_NO_* mode flags")
In the meantime, we should revert this patch because it regresses
some Qcom
based platforms until we figure out what's missing to make DSIM
based boards
happy.
I'll send a revert change afterwards.
That change would break existing use case on i.MX8M then, I disagree
with that revert.
As I understand the timeline is :
- 996e1defca344 was merged in v6.2-rc2 and caused regression on NXP
platforms
- 8ddce13ae696 was merged in v6.5-rc1 to fix that but caused
regression on QCOM platforms
Did I miss something ?
That looks about right.
I don't know how to handle this apart reverting 8ddce13ae696 and
trying to find a proper fix that doesn't regress QCOM.
I provided a suggestion above -- I believe QCOM is misinterpreting the
NO_H* flags and it needs separate flags for its behavior. The NXP
hardware per MX8M{M,N,P} reference manual (which is available at
NXP.com) skips the H* areas in the transfer, which matches the flags
description:
include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h-/* disable hback-porch area */
include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h:#define MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_NO_HBP BIT(6)
If the QCOM hardware does something else, it should introduce its own
set of flags for that something else and that would be problem solved,
for both platforms.
I don't have access to the QCOM hardware or datasheet however, is
either available ?
Like I have written above, the DSI spec gives two options which we can
do in the HBP/HSA/HFP periods:
1) Transition to LP11 which means blanking packets will not be sent
2) Send blanking packets during those periods
That flag controls exactly that and thats what MSM does.
There is no third option in the spec to not do either.
Now, are you saying that those flags are providing some other third
option which is not even there in the DSI spec?
Can you please have a look at the i.MX8M reference manual and read
exactly what that controller does , then compare it to the QCOM
controller behavior ?
