On 2.08.2023 15:13, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
>
> On 8/2/2023 6:12 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 2.08.2023 11:59, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
>>> Add dtsi for PMIC pm7550ba found in Qualcomm platforms.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>> Subject: "PMIC pm7550ba" -> "pm7550ba PMIC"
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +
>>> + pm7550ba_eusb2_repeater: phy@fd00 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,pm8550b-eusb2-repeater";
>> A new compatible should be introduced, so that it goes like this:
>>
>> compatible = "qcom,pm7550ba-eusb2-repeater", "qcom,pm8550b-eusb2-repeater";
> Just a doubt, Since the compatible can be same why we need to introduce a new compatible.
> Should every soc have a compatible string?
If it turns out that we need to add a quirk for PM7550BA 3 years down
the line, this approach lets us fix it for users that never updated
their device trees.
Konrad
