Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] firmware: qcom_scm: Add support for Qualcomm Secure Execution Environment SCM interface

[Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 7/30/23 18:19, Maximilian Luz wrote:

[...]

> diff --git a/include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h b/include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h
> index 250ea4efb7cb..dd4236cffbec 100644
> --- a/include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h
> @@ -122,4 +122,25 @@ extern int qcom_scm_lmh_dcvsh(u32 payload_fn, u32 payload_reg, u32 payload_val,
>   extern int qcom_scm_lmh_profile_change(u32 profile_id);
>   extern bool qcom_scm_lmh_dcvsh_available(void);
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_QCOM_QSEECOM
> +
> +int qcom_scm_qseecom_app_get_id(const char *app_name, u32 *app_id);
> +int qcom_scm_qseecom_app_send(u32 app_id, void *req, size_t req_size, void *rsp,
> +			      size_t rsp_size);
> +
> +#else /* CONFIG_QCOM_QSEECOM */
> +
> +int qcom_scm_qseecom_app_get_id(const char *app_name, u32 *app_id)
> +{
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +int qcom_scm_qseecom_app_send(u32 app_id, void *req, size_t req_size, void *rsp,
> +			      size_t rsp_size)
> +{
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}

As the kernel test robot rightfully complained: I forgot to static
inline both functions above. Already fixed for v6.

Regards
Max