Re: [PATCH 4/6] drm/msm/mdss: populate missing data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 at 02:14, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/26/2023 3:58 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jul 2023 at 01:30, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 5/21/2023 10:10 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> As we are going to use MDSS data for DPU programming, populate missing
> >>> MDSS data. The UBWC 1.0 and no UBWC cases do not require MDSS
> >>> programming, so skip them.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Can you pls point me to the downstream references you used for msm8998?
> >
> > msm-3.18, drivers/video/msm/mdss/mdss_mdp.c
> >
> > See the function mdss_mdp_hw_rev_caps_init(). It sets has_ubwc for MDP
> > 1.07 (msm8996), 1.14 (msm8937) / 1.16  (msm8953) and 3.0 (msm8998).
> >
>
> It sets has_ubwc but I still cannot locate where it says version is 1.0.
> Because the 0x58 register reads 0 and not 1 for msm8998.

What would be the version then? 0.0 sounds strange. I'm yet to check
whether UBWC works on 8996 / 8998.

> >> Was that just taken from catalog? If so I would ask for the reference
> >> for the catalog too.
> >>
> >> As per the register the decoder version is 0x0 and not 1.
> >>
> >> Even encoder version is 0 from what i see and not 1. Thats why a
> >> dec_version of UBWC_1_0 is not doing anything i assume.
> >>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux