Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: qcom: Update RPMHPD entries for some SoCs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 10:21:10AM +0530, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
> Update the RPMHPD references with new bindings defined in rpmhpd.h
> for Qualcomm SoCs SM8[2345]50.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml    | 3 ++-
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8350-videocc.yaml   | 3 ++-
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-camcc.yaml     | 3 ++-
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-dispcc.yaml    | 3 ++-
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml   | 3 ++-
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8550-dispcc.yaml    | 3 ++-
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,videocc.yaml          | 3 ++-
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8250-dpu.yaml | 3 ++-
>  .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8250-mdss.yaml          | 7 ++++---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8350-dpu.yaml | 3 ++-
>  .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8350-mdss.yaml          | 5 +++--
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8450-dpu.yaml | 3 ++-
>  .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8450-mdss.yaml          | 7 ++++---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8550-dpu.yaml | 3 ++-
>  .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8550-mdss.yaml          | 7 ++++---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml     | 3 ++-
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml               | 3 ++-
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8350-pas.yaml  | 5 +++--
>  18 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml
> index d6774db..d6b81c0 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml
> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ examples:
>    - |
>      #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
>      #include <dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/power/qcom,rpmhpd.h>
>      clock-controller@af00000 {
>        compatible = "qcom,sm8250-dispcc";
>        reg = <0x0af00000 0x10000>;
> @@ -103,7 +104,7 @@ examples:
>        #clock-cells = <1>;
>        #reset-cells = <1>;
>        #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> -      power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8250_MMCX>;
> +      power-domains = <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_MMCX>;
>        required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>      };
>  ...

Does this file still need to include old header? The same is applicable
to some of the other files in the patch also. 

We also discussed on the other thread [1] to move the regulator level 
definitions to new header. should this change be done after that, so that 
we don't end up touching the very same files again?

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/a4zztrn6jhblozdswba7psqtvjt5l765mfr3yl4llsm5gsyqef@7x6q7yabydvm/



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux