On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 08:24:01PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > Very surprisingly, qcm2290 does not seem to require any interface > clocks. What does this mean exactly? The interconnect .sync_state() is responsible to drop the initial maximum bandwidth votes, with the assumption that all active devices have voted for the bandwidth they need. How does this relate to "requiring interface clocks"? > It's therefore safe to enable sync_state to park unused devices. > Do so. Doesn't this make everything painfully slow? There are no interconnect consumers at all in qcm2290.dtsi. I would expect that all bandwidths end up at minimum. Thanks, Stephan
