On 11/08/15 23:49, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 07/08, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8960.c
b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8960.c
index eb6a4f9..2c80d03 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8960.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8960.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
@@ -3520,7 +3521,8 @@ static int gcc_msm8960_probe(struct
platform_device *pdev)
if (IS_ERR(clk))
return PTR_ERR(clk);
- return qcom_cc_probe(pdev, match->data);
+ qcom_cc_probe(pdev, match->data);
+ return of_platform_populate(pdev->dev.of_node, NULL, NULL,
&pdev->dev);
We just lost the error code from qcom_cc_probe()...
I think Rajendra picked up the wrong patch for this series, I did submit
a v2 (https://patches.linaro.org/44033/) with the above fixed.
ah, sorry about that.
Also, I don't like having a subnode in DT. Why can't we use the
same node as the GCC node and create a virtual child device here
for tsens? We can assign the same of_node that this platform
device has so that DT keeps working correctly.
So the current driver looks up data based on compatible strings.
So you suggesting to create a virtual child device for gcc and
associate the gcc DT node to it? (And have the tsens compatible
mentioned as part of the gcc DT node?)
How is this any different from creating a subnode in DT anyway?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
