On 8/5/2015 9:13 AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Wed, 05 Aug, at 05:10:00PM, Matt Fleming wrote:
On Wed, 05 Aug, at 08:58:52AM, Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong wrote:
Yes, absolutely. It has been in my mind, sorry I was tied up in the last
few days. I wonder what I may missed, I certainly do x86 build test with
versions of the patch set.
I will try today and report back.
No problem.
I'd suggest moving the implementation into include/acpi/apei.h and
leaving it as static inline instead of implementing it out of line in
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c.
Yeah, I didn't mean include/acpi/apei.h but the architecture-specific
equivalent.
Thank you Matt. It builds well on x86 with default configuration, but
not if APEI feature is turned on. This is my fault.
I just sent a new version of the patch set out.
--
Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
