On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 18:33:10 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> For some reason I used the wrong script to send this patchset, resend it
> including proper (linux-phy & maintainers) recipients.
>
> The patch at [1], which added another function just to have v4 vs v6
> register address difference prompted me to take a look at the combo PHY
> driver. We already have mechanism, register layout descriptions, for
> coping with register address differences, which I ignored while adding
> v4 support. It looks like nowadays this has exploded somehow, resulting
> inseveral almost-identicatical functions.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/7] phy: qcom: qmp-combo: correct bias0_en programming
commit: 8fa60f5ab940ba732644c996c3570b78b10b8fdc
[2/7] phy: qcom: qmp-combo: reuse register layouts for more registers
commit: 211ddf1d89cfb6be8aead2092c95bb285bf790b6
[3/7] phy: qcom: qmp-combo: reuse register layouts for even more registers
commit: 01f363f4eb0c0c35aa88a0ff2a329c4d88dc1da0
[4/7] phy: qcom: qmp-combo: reuse register layouts for some more registers
commit: 245fa640ea46ad430cd962351fef0618f71ffda9
[5/7] phy: qcom: qmp-combo: drop similar functions
commit: f4ed3532ca7422811083d15a204f91b8f5f8b49a
[6/7] phy: qcom: qmp-combo: drop qmp_v6_dp_aux_init()
commit: 8e4137dc4eac0982aeb4f3fd103598a41c4f165d
[7/7] phy: qcom: qmp-combo: extract common function to setup clocks
commit: 315a1a400d9c6533823e3e3af9b07cb4d0555f77
Best regards,
--
~Vinod
