Re: [PATCH 02/10] dt-bindings: power: Add rpm power domains for SDX75

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 7/4/2023 11:47 AM, Rohit Agarwal wrote:

On 7/3/2023 8:29 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 3.07.2023 16:42, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
Add RPM power domain bindings for the SDX75 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml | 1 +
  include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h                  | 8 ++++++++
  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
index afad313..58e1be8 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/qcom,rpmpd.yaml
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ properties:
        - qcom,sdm845-rpmhpd
        - qcom,sdx55-rpmhpd
        - qcom,sdx65-rpmhpd
+      - qcom,sdx75-rpmhpd
        - qcom,sm6115-rpmpd
        - qcom,sm6125-rpmpd
        - qcom,sm6350-rpmhpd
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
index 1bf8e87..8092d0d 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h
@@ -57,6 +57,14 @@
  #define SDX65_CX_AO    4
  #define SDX65_MXC    5
  +/* SDX75 Power Domain Indexes */
+#define SDX75_CX    0
+#define SDX75_CX_AO    1
+#define SDX75_MSS    2
+#define SDX75_MX    3
+#define SDX75_MX_AO    4
+#define SDX75_MXC    5
Please instead introduce a set of defines without the SoC prefix
(i.e. CX, CX_AO, MX etc.). We've been putting this off for too long
and you're the first unlucky guy that submitted new RPMhPD support after
we've concluded it'd be the way to go! :D Sadly, we can't replace the
existing ones retroactively..
Surely No issues. Will update it.

I have a doubt here. Cant we completely omit the #defines here and directly index this as 0,1,... because if the intention of this #defines is to understand the name of the pd then we can get
it from the .name attribute in rpmhpd as well, right?

The problems with a common set of #define would be, lets say if we define CX_AO as 1 and some platform doesn't have CX_AO then wouldnt it leave a null entry in the driver entry of that platform?

Thanks,
Rohit.


Thanks,
Rohit.
Konrad
+
  /* SM6350 Power Domain Indexes */
  #define SM6350_CX    0
  #define SM6350_GFX    1



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux