Hi,
quic_mdalam@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Thu, 15 Jun 2023 13:01:39 +0530:
> Implement exec_op() so we can later get rid of the legacy interface
> implementation.
>
> Co-developed-by: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Change in [v4]
>
> * No change for this patch, since this is part of exec_op
> series posting new patch.
>
> Change in [v3]
>
> * Removed NAND_CMD_STATUS check in pre_command and move
> it to status exec_op.
>
> * Removed min() , since this check not needed
>
> * Removed all the dummy APIs of exec_ops, and added it
> into same patch where its getting added.
>
> * Added qcom_check_op() API to check for unsupported feature
> by controller in check_only path.
>
> Change in [v2]
>
> * Missed to post Cover-letter, so posting v2 patch with cover-letter
>
> Change in [v1]
>
> * Added initial support for exec_ops.
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 159 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 159 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index 72d6168d8a1b..d9c4c9fe2fe8 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@
> #define OP_PAGE_PROGRAM_WITH_ECC 0x7
> #define OP_PROGRAM_PAGE_SPARE 0x9
> #define OP_BLOCK_ERASE 0xa
> +#define OP_CHECK_STATUS 0xc
> #define OP_FETCH_ID 0xb
> #define OP_RESET_DEVICE 0xd
>
> @@ -235,6 +236,8 @@ nandc_set_reg(chip, reg, \
> */
> #define NAND_ERASED_CW_SET BIT(4)
>
> +#define MAX_ADDRESS_CYCLE 5
> +#define MAX_CHUNK_SIZE SZ_8K
New line.
> /*
> * This data type corresponds to the BAM transaction which will be used for all
> * NAND transfers.
> @@ -447,6 +450,29 @@ struct qcom_nand_boot_partition {
> u32 page_size;
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Qcom op for each exec_op transfer
> + *
> + * @data_instr: data instruction pointer
> + * @data_instr_idx: data instruction index
> + * @rdy_timeout_ms: wait ready timeout in ms
> + * @rdy_delay_ns: Additional delay in ns
> + * @addr1_reg: Address1 register value
> + * @addr2_reg: Address2 register value
> + * @cmd_reg: CMD register value
> + * @flag: flag for misc instruction
> + */
> +struct qcom_op {
> + const struct nand_op_instr *data_instr;
> + unsigned int data_instr_idx;
> + unsigned int rdy_timeout_ms;
> + unsigned int rdy_delay_ns;
> + u32 addr1_reg;
> + u32 addr2_reg;
> + u32 cmd_reg;
> + u8 flag;
> +};
> +
> /*
> * NAND chip structure
> *
> @@ -2867,8 +2893,141 @@ static int qcom_nand_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int qcom_op_cmd_mapping(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, u8 cmd,
> + struct qcom_op *q_op)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + switch (cmd) {
> + case NAND_CMD_RESET:
> + ret = OP_RESET_DEVICE;
> + break;
> + case NAND_CMD_READID:
> + ret = OP_FETCH_ID;
> + break;
> + case NAND_CMD_PARAM:
> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)
> + ret = OP_PAGE_READ_ONFI_READ;
> + else
> + ret = OP_PAGE_READ;
> + break;
> + case NAND_CMD_ERASE1:
> + case NAND_CMD_ERASE2:
> + ret = OP_BLOCK_ERASE;
> + break;
> + case NAND_CMD_STATUS:
> + ret = OP_CHECK_STATUS;
> + break;
> + case NAND_CMD_PAGEPROG:
> + ret = OP_PROGRAM_PAGE;
> + break;
> + default:
Again, this is not a supported case, you should handle it. And this
must be checked upon check_only conditions as well.
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/* NAND framework ->exec_op() hooks and related helpers */
> +static void qcom_parse_instructions(struct nand_chip *chip,
> + const struct nand_subop *subop,
> + struct qcom_op *q_op)
> +{
> + struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
> + const struct nand_op_instr *instr = NULL;
> + unsigned int op_id;
> + int i;
> +
> + memset(q_op, 0, sizeof(*q_op));
> +
> + for (op_id = 0; op_id < subop->ninstrs; op_id++) {
> + unsigned int offset, naddrs;
> + const u8 *addrs;
> +
> + instr = &subop->instrs[op_id];
> +
> + switch (instr->type) {
> + case NAND_OP_CMD_INSTR:
> + q_op->cmd_reg = qcom_op_cmd_mapping(nandc, instr->ctx.cmd.opcode, q_op);
> + q_op->rdy_delay_ns = instr->delay_ns;
> + break;
> +
> + case NAND_OP_ADDR_INSTR:
> + offset = nand_subop_get_addr_start_off(subop, op_id);
> + naddrs = nand_subop_get_num_addr_cyc(subop, op_id);
> + addrs = &instr->ctx.addr.addrs[offset];
> + for (i = 0; i < MAX_ADDRESS_CYCLE; i++) {
> + if (i < 4)
> + q_op->addr1_reg |= (u32)addrs[i] << i * 8;
> + else
> + q_op->addr2_reg |= addrs[i];
> + }
> + q_op->rdy_delay_ns = instr->delay_ns;
> + break;
> +
> + case NAND_OP_DATA_IN_INSTR:
> + q_op->data_instr = instr;
> + q_op->data_instr_idx = op_id;
> + q_op->rdy_delay_ns = instr->delay_ns;
> + fallthrough;
> + case NAND_OP_DATA_OUT_INSTR:
> + q_op->rdy_delay_ns = instr->delay_ns;
> + break;
> +
> + case NAND_OP_WAITRDY_INSTR:
> + q_op->rdy_timeout_ms = instr->ctx.waitrdy.timeout_ms;
> + q_op->rdy_delay_ns = instr->delay_ns;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_check_op(struct nand_chip *chip,
> + const struct nand_operation *op)
> +{
> + const struct nand_op_instr *instr;
> + int op_id;
> +
> + for (op_id = 0; op_id < op->ninstrs; op_id++) {
> + instr = &op->instrs[op_id];
> +
> + switch (instr->type) {
> + case NAND_OP_CMD_INSTR:
> + if (instr->ctx.cmd.opcode == NAND_CMD_READCACHESEQ ||
> + instr->ctx.cmd.opcode == NAND_CMD_READCACHEEND)
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
Do you really need this check? These operations have specific pattern,
no? I believe you should not need this check.
> + break;
> + case NAND_OP_ADDR_INSTR:
> + if (instr->ctx.addr.naddrs > MAX_ADDRESS_CYCLE)
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
This one is not needed either, as long as you properly define the
patterns.
> +
> + break;
> + case NAND_OP_DATA_IN_INSTR:
> + case NAND_OP_DATA_OUT_INSTR:
> + if (instr->ctx.data.len > MAX_CHUNK_SIZE)
Same.
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_nand_exec_op(struct nand_chip *chip,
> + const struct nand_operation *op,
> + bool check_only)
> +{
> + if (check_only)
> + return qcom_check_op(chip, op);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct nand_controller_ops qcom_nandc_ops = {
> .attach_chip = qcom_nand_attach_chip,
> + .exec_op = qcom_nand_exec_op,
I understand the idea of making the series easier to review, and I
thank you for that, but in practice the series is not bisectable. I
doubt the driver works right after patch 1.
You will likely need two patches, one to add exec_op, one to remove the
legacy implementation.
> };
>
> static void qcom_nandc_unalloc(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
Thanks,
Miquèl
