On Tue, 27 Jun 2023 22:14:21 +0200, Marijn Suijten wrote: > SM6125 is identical to SM6375 except that while downstream also defines > a throttle clock, its presence results in timeouts whereas SM6375 > requires it to not observe any timeouts. This is represented by > reducing the clock array length to 6 so that it cannot be passed. Note > that any SoC other than SM6375 (currently SC7180 and SM6350) are > unconstrained and could either pass or leave out this "throttle" clock. > > Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sc7180-dpu.yaml | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
