On 24/06/2023 03:41, Marijn Suijten wrote:
SM6125 is identical to SM6375 except that while downstream also defines
a throttle clock, its presence results in timeouts whereas SM6375
requires it to not observe any timeouts.
I see that the vendor DTS still references this clock.
Abhinav, Tanya, do possibly know what can be wrong here?
Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sc7180-dpu.yaml | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sc7180-dpu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sc7180-dpu.yaml
index 630b11480496..6d2ba9a1cca1 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sc7180-dpu.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sc7180-dpu.yaml
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ properties:
compatible:
enum:
- qcom,sc7180-dpu
+ - qcom,sm6125-dpu
- qcom,sm6350-dpu
- qcom,sm6375-dpu
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
