On 2023-06-23 14:37:12, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: <snip> > > In fact I asked to make it 0xf00 + 0x10 or 0xf80 + 0x10 to also cover > > the CTL registers, but that change didn't make it through. 0x29c is an > > arbitrary number that I have no clue what it was based on. > > This should have been NAKed. or at least TODOed. As usual ;) - add new features first, fix the fundamentals... later? - Marijn
