Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] dt-bindings: msm: dsi-controller-main: Document clocks on a per compatible basis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22/06/2023 00:45, Marijn Suijten wrote:
Hi!

On 2023-01-18 17:16:21, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
Each compatible has a different set of clocks which are associated with it.
Add in the list of clocks for each compatible.

So if each set of compatibles have their own unique set of clocks, is
there a reason to have so many duplicate then: blocks?  I ran into this
while preparing for submitting SM6125 DPU and having no clue where to
add it.

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  .../display/msm/dsi-controller-main.yaml      | 218 ++++++++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 201 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)


[skipped most of the comments]


+
+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          contains:
+            enum:
+              - qcom,sc7180-dsi-ctrl
+              - qcom,sc7280-dsi-ctrl
+              - qcom,sm8250-dsi-ctrl
+              - qcom,sm8150-dsi-ctrl
+              - qcom,sm8250-dsi-ctrl
+              - qcom,sm8350-dsi-ctrl
+              - qcom,sm8450-dsi-ctrl
+              - qcom,sm8550-dsi-ctrl
+    then:
+      properties:
+        clocks:
+          maxItems: 6
+        clock-names:
+          items:
+            - const: byte
+            - const: byte_intf
+            - const: pixel
+            - const: core
+            - const: iface
+            - const: bus

... and here ...

+
+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          contains:
+            enum:
+              - qcom,sdm660-dsi-ctrl
+    then:
+      properties:
+        clocks:
+          maxItems: 9
+        clock-names:
+          items:
+            - const: mdp_core
+            - const: byte
+            - const: byte_intf
+            - const: mnoc
+            - const: iface
+            - const: bus
+            - const: core_mmss
+            - const: pixel
+            - const: core
+
+  - if:
+      properties:
+        compatible:
+          contains:
+            enum:
+              - qcom,sdm845-dsi-ctrl
+    then:
+      properties:
+        clocks:
+          maxItems: 6
+        clock-names:
+          items:
+            - const: byte
+            - const: byte_intf
+            - const: pixel
+            - const: core
+            - const: iface
+            - const: bus

and here, we have *three* identical lists of clocks.  Should they (have
been) combined?

I can send a patch fixing these all if desired!

Probably it would be logical to split follow DPU and MDSS schema and split this file into per-SoC compatibles and a generic file. Then it would be easier to review different SoC parts.

Regarding reordering of clocks. I think we have 5 different configurations in dsi_cfg.c, but we definitely can optimize the schema.


- Marijn

+
  additionalProperties: false
examples:
--
2.38.1


--
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Sparc]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux