Thanks Stephen,
On 14/07/15 23:06, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 07/10, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
+static int devm_nvmem_device_match(struct device *dev, void *res, void *data)
+{
+ struct nvmem_device **nvmem = res;
+
+ if (!nvmem || !*nvmem) {
+ WARN_ON(!nvmem || !*nvmem);
This could be
if (WARN_ON(!nvmem || !*nvmem))
Yep, will fix it.
+ return 0;
+ }
+ return *nvmem == data;
+}
+
[..]
+
+/**
+ * nvmem_device_write() - Write cell to a given nvmem device
+ *
+ * @nvmem: nvmem device to be written to.
+ * @offset: offset in nvmem device.
+ * @bytes: number of bytes to write.
+ * @buf: buffer to be written.
+ *
+ * The return value will be an length of bytes written or non zero on failure.
Should say negative value instead of non-zero? Length is
non-zero already.
General nitpick comment: Kernel-doc allows for a standard return
syntax.
Ok, I will fix such instances.
Return: length of bytes written or negative value on failure.
diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
index f589d3b..74eed42 100644
--- a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
@@ -12,15 +12,9 @@
#ifndef _LINUX_NVMEM_PROVIDER_H
#define _LINUX_NVMEM_PROVIDER_H
-struct nvmem_device;
+#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
-struct nvmem_cell_info {
- const char *name;
- int offset;
- int bytes;
- int bit_offset;
- int nbits;
-};
Why does this move from provider to consumer? Can't we do put
this struct in the right place from the beginning?
I will take care of it in next version.
--srini
+struct nvmem_device;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
